There are rumors circulating on the net that Michelle Obama’s mother may be practicing witchcraft in the White House, and that Barack, citing his alleged Christian beliefs and anticipating controversy, has told her to stop.
Mary points out that Yahoo, often has headlines that are fairly controversial, particularly with a conservative slant, and then disappear. I saw the article as a yahoo headline. A couple blogs picked it up. When I did a google search, there were several hits, and all the sites had been taken down. Several of the hits were satirical, so that may have been the origin.
In any case, it is only fair to point out that, while it’s not inconceivable that Marian Robinson may be practicing some form of voodoo or santeria or whatever, we know her son-in-law is definitely a practicing New Ager.
Let’s not forget that Nancy Reagan consulted an astrologer in the White House. George H. W. Bush’s “nickname” in Skull & Bones (the secret society at Yale that has produced a disproportionate number of presidents, Supreme Court Justices and other highly influential Americans) was “Magog.”
Let’s remember: most of the “Founding Fathers” were members of the Freemasons. The Freemasons adopt the Gnostic belief that there were two Gods in the old Testament, embodied in what “modern Scripture Scholars” call the “Elohist source” and the “Yahwehist Source.”
The “modern Scripture scholar” side of it has that there are two parallel narratives in the Old Testament, explaining things like the two “Creation Accounts” and other redundant stories in the Pentateuch, or Chronicles versus Samuel/Kings, etc. The story goes that one “tradition” likes to refer to God using the Tetragrammaton YHWH, while the other uses the generic Hebrew name for God, Elohim. It would be the equivalent of one Greek writer telling a story about “Zeus” while another Greek writer told a parallel but different story about “Theos.” In any case, some modern Scripture scholars go so far as to say the accoutns, which sometimes differ in God’s “personality,” are talking about two different gods altogether.
The Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses, similarly believe in a kind of Dualistic reading of the Bible. In both those religions, Jesus and Satan were brothers. The Witnesses teach that St. Michael = Jesus. Interestingly, Joseph Smith had Masonic ties.
I’ve read testimonies from those who’ve been involved in varying degrees with Masonry and the Shriners. Many think the Shriners are the more “harmless” aspect of the Masons because they do those nice parades and children’s charities and hospitals and stuff, but the Shriners are, in fact, some of the most deeply involved Masons. Shriners, like all Masons, worship Lucifer.
They exalt the Pyramids, the Tower of Babel, and other ancient “achievements.” The whole reason they are called Freemasons is that they believe in what man can build without God’s assistance. This, again is why the Church condemnd freemasonry to begin with: it advocates human achievement without God, human alliance without concern for religious differences, charity without Christ.
Meanwhile, the word Gnosticism, of course, comes from the Greek Gnosis, “knowledge.” The Gnostics believed there was secret knowledge that a select few could have and the rest of the public remained ignorant. Of course, a lot of people think that. Averroneans think that. Platonists think that. Atheists like Myers, Dawkins and Hitchens think that.
What makes Gnosticism different is that the knowledge in question is basically what we now call, collectively, “magic” (although many of the terms we now use as synonymous had different meanings originally). Gnosticism arose of out Babylonian mystery cults, and, as the ideology moved through the ancient Near East and Mediterranean, it would co-opt the literature and religion of each local culture.
So the Gnostics also saw the Old Testament as a story of two Gods, and they saw the true “good” God as Lucifer, who was trying to provide humanity with the knowledge that the evil Yahweh was denying.
Our founding fathers were, mostly Masons. Jefferson expressed the hope that America’s separation of Church and State–which he said should be a “Wall”–would one day lead to everyone being Unitarian.
Many of our national images are masonic. Most of the monuments in DC are Masonic in design. The dollar bill has the masonic symbol of the eye at the top of a pyramid on it.
Many Conservatives make a big deal about “in God we Trust” on our money. I don’t. The God the money is referring to is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Blessed Trinity. The God it is referring to is the God of Masonry.
Now, let’s get to the whole New Age Thing: Oprah, Deepak Chopra and all the other gurus love him.
I’ve cited those quotes many times here. Obama sees Jesus as “one of many” great religious leaders. He says his idea of heaven is tucking his daughters in. He says his idea of prayer is silently thinking about how to solve a problem.
His religious view is centered on him. It’s amorphous. He is a Christian, by his own admission, only in a kind of a cultural African American way, but he has “problems” with many Christian teachings.
Long story short, it doesn’t really matter whether the Freemasons are one united group taking over the world or just a bunch of people who share simiarlly flawed beliefs, or a bunch of groups of people who are not united but share similarly flawed beliefs. It also doesn’t matter if all presidents have been specifically members of the Masons, though they all come from similar backgrounds. It is more realistic to acknowledge that there are multiple behind-the-scenes power structures manipulating American politics.
But, from the political side, representative democracy is a sham, and, from the religious side, we have a system which encourages ambitious people to pursue power ambitiously, and that leads directly down, to borrow a phrase, “The path to the Dark Side.” Satan is the prince of this world. Yes, Jesus won the battle on the Cross. Yes, God is in control. But Jesus still makes it clear who the Enemy is, and that the Enemy has the reigns as far as this world goes, that the Kingdom of God, in this life, only exists in the heart of the individual believer.
I don’t believe a good person has any hope of political advancement in our society, and I believe a few near-exceptions to the rule prove it. You may manage to get a cable TV talk show, or a seat in the House, or a state-level positoin. Some good people may even get into advisory or cabinet level jobs. But a good Senator is hard to find (Santorum anyone? Brownback?) and a good president or Supreme Court Justice is harder (Scalia?)
You don’t obtain that kind of power from nothing unless you’re either 100% saintly (and that would preclude pursuit of worldly power) or else you’re working for the one who grants worldly power.
We don’t need rumors about Marian Robinson and Santeria to tell us that.